shibboleth-dev - Re: build question
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Will Norris <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: build question
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:54:38 -0600
On Nov 19, 2005, at 10:13 PM, Tim Freeman wrote:
I'm reinstalling the latest shib IdP (1.3c) and ran into a situation. I don't
know if it is necessarily a problem though. On a completely new tarball
expansion, running "./ant" and choosing #2 "manager" for the Tomcat part of the
installation bypasses all of the persistent directory creation (build.properties
-> idp.home) and it ultimately reports that everything went well.
I assumed the manager/filesystem question was only about the Tomcat part of the
installation.
If this is unintended, it looks like most of the "install.idp.filesystem" target needs to
be moved to another, common target that "install.idp.filesystem" and
"install.idp.manager" can both antcall.
Yes, you're absolutely right. File a bug report if you don't mind, and I'll clean that up.
--
Will Norris
Information Technology
The University of Memphis
- build question, Tim Freeman, 11/19/2005
- Re: build question, Will Norris, 11/21/2005
- Re: build question, Tim Freeman, 11/21/2005
- Re: build question, Will Norris, 11/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.