shibboleth-dev - Re: passive authN
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: passive authN
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:18:07 -0500
- Organization: UIS - Project Sentinel
Tom Scavo wrote:
Instead of mapping the AuthnRequest schema onto yet another API, why
not simply pass the SAML itself and leave it to the SSO provider to
parse. In the end, everyone will consume and produce SAML, right? ;-)
The design does this. The SAML AuthN Request is available to the handler.
--
Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall
Project Sentinel 202.687.0124
- RE: passive authN, (continued)
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, Jim Fox, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- RE: passive authN, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Scavo, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Scavo, 11/03/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, Tom Scavo, 11/03/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/03/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2005
- Re: passive authN, Chad La Joie, 11/03/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/03/2005
- Re: passive authN, Chad La Joie, 11/03/2005
- RE: passive authN, Scott Cantor, 11/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.