Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - passive authN

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

passive authN


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: passive authN
  • Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:10:43 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kgk+QCM6KR4aUlO2Zzk/OGbQSrAUAYyabnhuK2z04nI0v60Ur2V7l7p9qV8NzX91Wqp6sww+fndUA85fnqPbMLs4C4WIZsBJbi644lzW1tjhnkrmWBLurT20YbD9EX4bck47+7S5yCN+nPZAlvrWGnf9MCxAx39H52xL1zvR+z0=
Currently, local authN/SSO sits in front of the IdP. At the I2MM WG
session in Sep, it was noted that the architecture of the IdP must
change to accommodate passive authN in SAML 2.0, which makes total
sense. No details were given, however. Could someone elaborate? If
the IdP subsumes the authN step, what plugin mechanism will it use to
support a variety of local authN services?

Thanks,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page