Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: bugs in extension-build.xml

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: bugs in extension-build.xml


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: bugs in extension-build.xml
  • Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:31:13 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FGqhXXQ7ohViD9h6a9meTZC+wMZKPeYYkn4521A4yw5+PYLnbNVIlJqS3KGtAPA8HIR0K51OMMoRHDydfJvaj+4ROCtdlbIMxdmd00hzHCty8vUz55qzlxaqr1ySpy8qhp2w0ViPpFf3M1ALdnoqBnb/Sm/ZMUfmzmCOaBUMdCM=
On 8/19/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> Why? Jar files should contain the version. The ones that don't drive me
> nuts.

Like shib-util.jar? :-)

> Java is broken fundamentally in terms of versioning libraries, but
> this makes it worse.
>
> > ext.name=gridshib-idp-0.3.1
> >
> > Good for directory names, bad for the jar file (for obvious reasons).
>
> You'll have to explain those "obvious" reasons. I'd say it's the correct
> name.

Unless I'm mistaken, this will lead to multiple jar files in $IDP_HOME$/lib:

lib/gridshib-idp-0.3.jar
lib/gridshib-idp-0.3.1.jar
lib/gridshib-idp-0.4.jar
etc.

This would be bad, right? Am I missing something?

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page