Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Wiki Revamp

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Wiki Revamp


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Nate Klingenstein <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: Wiki Revamp
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:46:37 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e06HhLa2TTUR1vOD8OL/ctGb+wQN9Xrp0byU+YwpZVIOhEk/s3jRzzs2OqThiKMaSuHiKhMYSEM6mFw8QOJ6XMWLsvEZ5X9bntXRjjkNjJiqlXBrx0fxsE02xQTOLQkuw8LoZt3oecjEj/vUA0ysHy8qZFTJwlS2itdxtPdyYUk=

On 7/13/05, Nate Klingenstein
<>
wrote:
>
> > - Where's the FAQ?
>
> I'd
> like to see this raised in a broader discussion asking precisely that
> question, and then we can make something good that lives somewhere good
> and hopefully be done with it for awhile.

A FAQ is never done, which is why a wiki-supported FAQ would be great.

> Bear in mind with this and
> the glossary we want some information to be thoroughly vetted and
> authoritative.

The FAQ should have broad user input, I think. I agree that the
glossary is different and so maybe it should be organized under a
different heading (Team?).

> > - What about Installation > Requirements?
>
> Covered thoroughly in the deployment guides.

I would think SoftwareRequirements would be a good topic under Installation.

> > - Bibliography (standards, specifications, etc.)
>
> I'm not sure whether the Bibliography should be part of the main
> Shibboleth pages or the Wiki. I'd lean Wiki, but it's fragmented
> throughout the former presently. I might bump the eAuth information
> down a layer and replace that with a bibliography.

A good bibliography is important but difficult. There should be an
authoritative source of bibliographic information for the entire
project, but I'm not sure what the best source form is.

> > - FeatureRequests (or WishList)
>
> This can live beneath the RoadMap.

I think the RoadMap should be driven by the Team while FeatureRequests
come from Community.

> > - Deployment > Profiles
>
> I've got this listed under ShibbolethDevelopment. Where do you think
> it should live?

I don't know. Maybe CommonConfigurations is a better topic name.

> > What about Testing, Troubleshooting, and Hardening (i.e.,
> > SecurityConsiderations)?
>
> Considered aspects of ProductionDeployment.

Hardening maybe, but not the other two. IMO Testing is a missing link
in the typical deployment process. And of course Troubleshooting is
probably the single most important topic of all.

Tom

PS. The paragraph "Contribution access..." on Shibboleth/WebHome
belongs in the Main web, not the Shibboleth web.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page