shibboleth-dev - Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism

From: Tom Scavo <>
To: Walter Hoehn <>
Cc: Shibboleth Developers <>
Subject: Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:20:14 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=d1Cvr3NAFOqv9FDfwz1uz0h1vA8NCyXLpbQd4ZJTfTFgLe8cSNbVJridoG854M/1H26IRbaQuU6ktlJLtkbL3VzdyySfbE/hGUHOFC6XmUnwSE/jNa8UqOve79nWUmcdIdIMmAjYCDBHgwmdjj65ItuGb1sYWtBYYPzt87up1so=

On 7/11/05, Walter Hoehn
<>
wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help on this. I feel like what we have now is WAY
> better than what we started with a few weeks back.

I totally agree! Thanks to all of you for making this happen so quickly.

Tom

Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, (continued)
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Chad La Joie, 07/11/2005
  - Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/11/2005
    - Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Chad La Joie, 07/11/2005
      - Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/11/2005
        
        Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Chad La Joie, 07/11/2005
        
        Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/11/2005
        
        Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Walter Hoehn, 07/11/2005
        Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/11/2005

List archive

Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism