Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: dependency issue in build.xml

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: dependency issue in build.xml


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Ian Young <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: dependency issue in build.xml
  • Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:15:39 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ORVh4fqF4WMp+qZOIAXeXxP1eX7met49IaJQwgLoajcT+JTgGvOexqK6MKahLydO2vN7rJAk0iIsqfldgYYcN1NXuX+/DZdrHKXYfV0dTlpg5s+aQSnjjlfDiNE5Cg77eXnO9wFBevRdtzmoa1DNXky32e/7Y6i31HXfb9tG/lQ=
On 7/5/05, Ian Young
<>
wrote:
> As at build.xml rev 1.66, the package-idp and package-sp tasks depend on
> properties called idp.home.url and sp.home.url. Those are created by a
> task called install.url, but that task isn't a dependency for the other two.
>
> I'm assuming the reason no-one else hits this is that they don't call
> package-idp and package-sp directly, but indirectly as part of something
> that does call install.url.

Right. Couldn't you use "install.idp.filesystem" and
"install.sp.filesystem" as a workaround?

If you add the dependencies to package-idp and package-sp (probably a
good idea), then you could remove the corresponding dependencies from
install.*.filesystem, right?

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page