shibboleth-dev - Re: distcopy target in build.xml

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: distcopy target in build.xml

From: Tom Scavo <>
To: Walter Hoehn <>
Cc: Howard Gilbert <>,
Subject: Re: distcopy target in build.xml
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 15:05:29 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=swn2/c4sikO+HgqfU7PRSlZp20jPPJMJtiBdFj3cBkb3BSXcb+e3QX9mOKx51TkaoZHybtBDKGxN1vILKGynECWABunl8GAIjbJmS+3ThyS5wcXT2GVWJ07XKsZp7L+CGKPyvBXeibEVxGsaLDpjZE1YRk7gKrvElwYocqAJjF8=

On 5/19/05, Walter Hoehn
<>
wrote:
> An assumption was always made about the deployment descriptor, since
> "distcopy" was only meaningful if one had already used the other
> tasks to generate a war.

True.

> You can definitely modify the descriptor template, or we could make
> another variable that points to some other template.

At this point I can't comment one way or the other since I'm still
trying to understand the new build process and how it impacts what I'm
doing.

Tom

distcopy target in build.xml, Andrew Booth, 05/18/2005
- RE: distcopy target in build.xml, Howard Gilbert, 05/18/2005
  - Re: distcopy target in build.xml, Tom Scavo, 05/18/2005
  - Re: distcopy target in build.xml, Walter Hoehn, 05/19/2005
    - Re: distcopy target in build.xml, Tom Scavo, 05/19/2005
      - Re: distcopy target in build.xml, Walter Hoehn, 05/19/2005
        
        Re: distcopy target in build.xml, Tom Scavo, 05/19/2005
        
        Re: distcopy target in build.xml, Walter Hoehn, 05/19/2005

List archive

Re: distcopy target in build.xml