Shibboleth Developers

a few more items at the bottom......

IMPORTANT E-DIAL PHONE NUMBER HAS CHANGED AS OF Jan 1!

1-866-411-0013 (toll free US/Canada only)
or 1 -800-392-6130 (alternate toll free US/Canada only)

for callers outside the USA/Canada dial 1-734-615-7474 (not free)

Pin # (remains the same): 0142203

Agenda:

1) Startup
      - Roll call, agenda bash
      - Intellectual Property Rights Awareness: Internet2
Intellectual Property Framework
                (http://members.internet2.edu/intellectualproperty.html)

2) status updates, v1.3
        - various trust implementations
        - java target
        - IdP status
        - SP status
        - other items?

3) discuss bundling of CAS

4) Documentation -- what are the initial  priorities for v1.3?

5) other items ....

-- revised shib + subversion proposal from arkansas.. (attached)

-- agenda for shib wg session @ I2MM -- proposal from stc:

        -- changes with shib v1.3

	-- the roadmap after 1.3. Try to provoke discussions, 
suggestions on some of the futures items.

-- question from elsevier -- what labels do we want to use to refer to IC/IQ..

At 5:56 PM +0100 4/14/05, Weertman, Niels (ELS) wrote:
> At 8:23 AM +0100 4/14/05, Weertman, Niels (ELS) wrote:
> > [Weertman, Niels (ELS)] I guess what I refer to as the Federation Display
> > Name is internal jargon. Selecting the IdP will be a two-step process: a)
> > selection of geographical entity and b) selection of institutions within
> the
> > entity. So, we will use geographical organization as a middle sorting tier;
> > we are quite flexible in terms of what text to use in our interface. Now we
> > are just wondering how to geographically described both InCommon and
> InQueue
> > as they overlap geographically.
>
> is the current thinking that browser users would have to click
> through two pages (first select a geo entity, then select an IdP), or
> are you imagining that the initial implementation would merely use
> the geo/fed names as an organizing tool within a single page (and to
> begin the branding process)? I'd vote very strongly for the
> latter......
>
> [Weertman, Niels (ELS)] they don't have to go to two separate pages. If
> basically works as follows: the user selects the region he is from from a
> dropdown widget or selects 'all regions' and thereupon the list with
> institutions per region is displayed. So it's really a organization tool on
> one page.

Attachment: apon-shib-suv-proposal.doc
Description: MS-Word document