Shibboleth Developers

[Walter Hoehn <>]

Yes, the plan is for this to be included in the 1.3 release.  What is 
the timeframe for your next WebCT/Shib integration rev?

-Walter


On Nov 5, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Mark Wilcox wrote:

> Speaking of the Java Service Provider  -- is that in the current 
> release or is that coming out in 1.3? I’m much rather use this code as 
> the basis for my next revision on WebCT/Shib integration than 
> continuing with my homegrown code.
>
>  
>
> Mark
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard Gilbert 
> [mailto:]
>  Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:53 AM
> To: 
>
> Subject: shireURL, providerId, applicationId, and target parameters
>
>  
>
> The C++ and Java Service Providers have potential differences in their 
> configuration philosophy. Currently the same configuration file 
> generates the same result thanks to careful programming.
>
>  
>
> Everything you need is already part of the protocol and configuration 
> schemas. I would argue that the current C++ code and the resulting 
> configuration examples assume some redundancy in items that need not 
> be redundant. There are some interesting possibilities here if we are 
> willing to draw some distinctions. Or maybe not.
>
>  
>
> I have written a rather extensive discussion of the interplay between 
> parameters, and lay some proposals on the table for a broader 
> interpretation. See
>
>  
>
> http://tp.its.yale.edu/shib/tiki-index.php?page=ShireUrl
>
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature