shibboleth-dev - RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again)
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: "'David L. Wasley'" <>, 'Shibboleth Developers' <>
- Cc: "'David H. Walker'" <>
- Subject: RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again)
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 22:12:59 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Agreed. Since it's not a scoped "handle" it is potentially dangerous
> and therefore should be treated as such in ARPs.
1.2 offers the ability to treat specific requesters as a unit for purposes
of controlling the kinds of identifiers the AA will resolve into a
principal. That's at least a step in the right direction.
-- Scott
- A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), David L. Wasley, 05/01/2004
- Re: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Tom Barton, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Scott Cantor, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), David L. Wasley, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Scott Cantor, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), David L. Wasley, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Scott Cantor, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), David L. Wasley, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Scott Cantor, 05/01/2004
- Re: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Tom Barton, 05/02/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), David L. Wasley, 05/01/2004
- RE: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Scott Cantor, 05/01/2004
- Re: A Case for Shibboleth and PKI (again), Tom Barton, 05/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.