shibboleth-dev - RE: More re: timestamp
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>
- To: Scott Cantor <>
- Cc: "'Shibboleth Dev Team'" <>
- Subject: RE: More re: timestamp
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:16:18 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Scott Cantor wrote:
> I wonder if that would be workable with the SAML profiles or not. Might
> be worth a look.
Well, the current profiles don't specify how the browser gets from the
target to the "inter-site transfer service", so seems like it would, or
could.
> How does that work? A shared domain cookie? What happens if the target
> doesn't share a domain with the weblogin server?
Then you use Shib 8^). This is probably pubcookie's biggest weakness;
there is discussion about whether to fix it or not.
- RL "Bob"
- More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/05/2004
- Re: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/05/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/05/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/06/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/06/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/06/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/05/2004
- Re: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.