shibboleth-dev - More re: timestamp
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To:
- Subject: More re: timestamp
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:52:08 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: The Ohio State University
Just to follow up, I do actually have something like a request ID and some
statefulness in my Web-ISO that allows me to do a better job than I would
otherwise be able to do with just the timestamp. I'm sure pubcookie has
something similar.
Certainly that would be nice to have too, but that's a much larger change to
the origin code than just a timestamp would be, so I'm not pushing for that
(yet).
One reason the timestamp is needed anyway is because the state in the login
service would likely be flushed every so often, and the timestamp catches
really old requests.
Even today, I have some holes in my system that I just didn't care enough
about to plug (I'm lazy). My interest is just in improvement, not
perfection, and this happens to have a lot of bang for the buck.
-- Scott
- More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/05/2004
- Re: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/05/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/05/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/06/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/06/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/06/2004
- RE: More re: timestamp, Scott Cantor, 01/05/2004
- Re: More re: timestamp, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 01/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.