shibboleth-dev - Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: 'Shibboleth Design Team' <>
- Subject: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:16:11 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: The Ohio State University
Google is a wonderful thing...
http://www.netsys.com/sunmgr/1996-11/msg00082.html
So, the interesting thing is that it looks like Sun RPC in general is not
going to do too well if the number of raised, at least if the svc_fdset
global descriptor set is used, which we do.
Now, of course, on Sun, we're using our own build of SunRPC, so we could
just modify the code to use FD_SETSIZE instead of asking the kernel, and it
will work fine. That's not a general fix though, since I'd imagine Linux
would also fail if the limit was raised, and recompiling RPC there isn't
real attractive for users.
-- Scott
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Scott Cantor, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Derek Atkins, 07/18/2003
- RE: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Scott Cantor, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Derek Atkins, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Steven_Carmody, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Derek Atkins, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Steven_Carmody, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Derek Atkins, 07/18/2003
- RE: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Scott Cantor, 07/18/2003
- Re: Nice concise writeup on raising rlim_fd_max, Derek Atkins, 07/18/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.