shibboleth-dev - RE: Target binaries / miscellany
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: 'Derek Atkins' <>
- Cc: 'Shibboleth Design Team' <>
- Subject: RE: Target binaries / miscellany
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:57:01 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Is there some particular reason you chose to use gcc-3.2.2-2 and
> libstdc++-3.2.2-2 instead of gcc-3.2-7 and libstdc++-3.2-7? Is there
> some known bug(s) in the 3.2-7 versions, or can I downgrade
> and rebuild the packages using the standard RH8 compiler?
The box wasn't RH8, and those packages date from way before RH8 was even
released. I used what was available about 12 months ago.
shib1 hadn't even been used until these builds.
I would assume gcc 3.2-7 is gcc 3.2 and not 3.2+, but I don't really care
either way. It wasn't meant as a RH8 build, I was just
creating a "recent compiler" build.
-- Scott
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Target binaries / miscellany, Scott Cantor, 05/22/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 05/24/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, Derek Atkins, 05/25/2003
- RE: Target binaries / miscellany, Scott Cantor, 05/27/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, Derek Atkins, 05/25/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, Derek Atkins, 05/27/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, Steven_Carmody, 05/27/2003
- RE: Target binaries / miscellany, Scott Cantor, 05/27/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, Derek Atkins, 05/27/2003
- Re: Target binaries / miscellany, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 05/24/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.