shibboleth-dev - Re: Compiler version for Linux?
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Derek Atkins <>
- To: Scott Cantor <>
- Cc: "'Shibboleth Design Team'" <>
- Subject: Re: Compiler version for Linux?
- Date: 18 Mar 2003 13:08:25 -0500
I dont think it really matters... I plan to continue using 3.0.4
locally, but the binary release can use either version.
-derek
Scott Cantor
<>
writes:
> Should we move up to a current gcc, or stay with 3.04 when we do the 1.0
> release?
>
> I only stuck with it because of the hassle of upgrading to it on older
> Linux versions, which only affects people building certain
> pieces from source. Really, though, building something like Apache could be
> done with older gcc and it should still work.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
PGP key available
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Compiler version for Linux?, Scott Cantor, 03/18/2003
- Re: Compiler version for Linux?, Derek Atkins, 03/18/2003
- RE: Compiler version for Linux?, Scott Cantor, 03/18/2003
- Re: Compiler version for Linux?, Derek Atkins, 03/18/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.