Shibboleth Developers

At 4:23 PM -0400 9/10/02, Walter Hoehn wrote:
> Per Scott's request, I have separated out "Web Site" and "CVS" as 
> individual components.
>
> -Walter
>
>
> Walter Hoehn wrote:
> > I tested creating dependent bugs among multiple bugzilla "products" 
> > and it seems to work without any problems.  I went ahead and 
> > modified the configuration thusly:
> >
> > Products:
> >     Shibboleth
> >         Components:
> >             Build Process
> >             Documentation
> >             Origin
> >             Target
> >             WAYF
> >             Web Site/CVS   
> >     OpenSAML
> >         Components:
> >             C++ Library
> >             Java Library

is there any value in decomposing Origin and Target any further?

For instance, on the origin side, the HS is relatively simple and 
won't see  continual  enhancement. The AA, on the other hand, is 
likely to continue  to evolve, over some longish period. However, I 
can see an  argument being made both ways.

On the target side, I can imagine  the RM becoming a separate component.

On the other hand, we're all aware of the pitfalls of starting out 
and dividing things too finely.

Once we agree on the components, what's the next step?

        - specifying versions and targets? How do we  want to use these?

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

   http://archives.internet2.edu/

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--