Shibboleth Developers

[Scott Cantor <>]

> Are you intentionally leaving out the "else" for inner "if"?  
> i.e you do not allow special default behavior for each SHAR, right?
I 
> don't think that is flexible enough.  I believe it should be:

Yes, it's intentional. Why does forcing this default to exist create
flexibility?

> Another way of saying it is to force AA to have a "*" policy 
> for each SHAR.

Right, but we don't force that in the architecture. The "else" condition
is that you go look for a wildcarded SHAR match, at which point there's
probably a match for * that tells it what to send.

You *can* create a default policy for the SHAR, in which case it will
get chosen, but why force one?

-- Scott

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

    http://archives.internet2.edu/

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--