Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] PTP supported?

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] PTP supported?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Raul Lopes <>
  • To: Tim Chown <>
  • Cc: Shawn McKee <>, Szymon Trocha <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PTP supported?
  • Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:53:37 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jisc.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=jisc.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=jisc.ac.uk; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=zPCePOVEzboNYhYw8Yb/JWTVdkkKuPIVId1wk9GJ0mg=; b=HQ0N7mZXG85NpyCxoXnapNeY7DAVySTZoTZQDn/16gFEnU7nLJDPZDz9BWgLBSH4mX20d4lBfw8XuaG++jFmiBAVfRggMZvhc3JsX2LtCEeZsX1o96jbHidD/9adL+VHhE/AW3zRhVF1qfN3OPlyMtWoRRh6e9tbl0mK8X5G2geAk9FZv4Uwi1aO52tokgJMD04hlceseL+ELZjZJ4HYDIJVxtWaZS+4caZoB+CLfOVur1u6s10Dt/OQkgBd8057LkEQXV8n9HNvdIDH9Mu/OfmdZDA2jX8XgUwIaU364FTG8X6bu4DLUy0zDGDVEuBvOCECMs9FEqPIk30F9gS/9w==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MRceLShfNJ/r8FZV1+BdOyCSydE9QXVdHloEGBC1E98L0eQUm0vmwca8AxGvzbBxrv3+VaCD9pJqza0ICx4FCAiuS098wZfgID29ibFPvD1nhW0jpZ8uFLjxos1B857FUmQKBxfSsV+qjXxQmeO4FBjtD/F4u+CXzXXJRFu1VCqTb3R4ka5GYnSvUfIAPEmG05oVZJhM4DQ+O+iWuc+kwcUjmol4b2ig0mna/nuKklN91sof9rdFGpOVtRlKMXzqEoVxDg4k5/mC630rnBO85P0bKRCiK7D1IUNK2BhfPOtBK7Dv4gA8JorOn+B4xKa4Zg7WujB6I9SFuLMyB3Kymg==
  • Msip_labels:

Yes, the WLCG dashboard has quite a few cases. You can see between any pair of hosts in London.

I think that we could this in our WLCG meeting next week.


Raul

From: Tim Chown <>
Sent: 15 November 2022 15:47
To: Raul Lopes <>
Cc: Shawn McKee <>; Szymon Trocha <>; <>
Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PTP supported?
 
> On 15 Nov 2022, at 15:43, Raul Lopes <> wrote:
>
> Chrony should help withh PTP, according to Red Hat. However, I think that perfSOAR still wants ntpd, right?
>
> I would hope that PTP might drive away a lot of "negative latency" we see in some pS dashboards.

It would be interesting to dive into the data where there are examples of this, presumably for very low OWD paths, sub 2-3ms, or even lower than that.  Is it NTP not being accurate enough, or some issue with NTP config or the network paths involved.

Some data driven analysis of perhaps some of the WLCG the perfSONR latency data might be enlightening.

Tim

>
> Raul
>
>  From: Shawn McKee <>
> Sent: 15 November 2022 15:22
> To: Tim Chown <>
> Cc: Szymon Trocha <>; Raul Lopes <>; <>
> Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PTP supported?
>  Hi Everyone,
>
> I would second (or third) the enhancement to support PTP.  We just got our PTP antenna installed for AGLT2 a few weeks ago.  We have PTP capable Dell switches using PTP to hold times.
> My challenge is to get our perfSONAR instances to use it.
>
> Shawn
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:38 AM Tim Chown <> wrote:
> > On 14 Nov 2022, at 15:03, Szymon Trocha <> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Raul,
> >
> > W dniu 10.11.2022 o 19:35, Raul Lopes (via perfsonar-user Mailing List) pisze:
> >> Dear perfsonar team,
> >>
> >> Is PTP supported in perfSONAR?
> >>
> > I addition to what Ed replied - I'm wondering about the rationale behind your question. Is PTP configured and used in JISC? Is it going to be your replacement of NTP?
> >
> > (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.perfsonar.net%2FFAQ.html%23q-does-perfsonar-support-ptp&amp;data=05%7C01%7CRaul.Lopes%40jisc.ac.uk%7Cc5c514e04d3f4395dbc908dac720be70%7C48f9394d8a144d2782a6f35f12361205%7C0%7C0%7C638041240709160828%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=6BpqHzYOFPfgGzAtn2IiXcBisSI3drJ1HlSRO9vdZVk%3D&amp;reserved=0)
>
> No, at this stage there’s no PTP service on Janet.  But other NRENs are starting to offer one, and we’re in the process of looking at use cases.  One may well be more accurate OWD measurements.
>
> One thing the perfSONAr community could do, or a researcher in it, is look at the existing latency measurements each way between measurement points and see how they correlate, and whether there is clock drift.  My feeling is that mostly in R&E networks there’s ~1ms accuracy based on existing NTP driven timing.
>
> The current perfSONAr docs say PTP is not supported due to the cost of deploying it.  I think that has changed.
>
> Tim--
> To unsubscribe from this list:
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.internet2.edu%2Fsympa%2Fsignoff%2Fperfsonar-user&amp;data=05%7C01%7CRaul.Lopes%40jisc.ac.uk%7Cc5c514e04d3f4395dbc908dac720be70%7C48f9394d8a144d2782a6f35f12361205%7C0%7C0%7C638041240709160828%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=bBIDEMuCcktx%2F9ULVlClkqpJ0C93gPSkv%2BzDENJgFQU%3D&amp;reserved=0



Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number. 05747339, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.

Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 02881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.

Jisc Commercial Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by shares which is registered in England under company number 09316933, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.

For more details on how Jisc handles your data see our privacy notice here: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page