perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] [External] Re: Tests btw perfsonar & network device
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Hunter Fuller <>
- To: Mark Feit <>
- Cc: HADJALI Mehdi <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] [External] Re: Tests btw perfsonar & network device
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:09:58 -0500
Wow, I didn't know about the TWAMP responder in Cisco IOS XE, thanks
for the tip!
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipsla/configuration/xe-3s/sla-xe-3s-book/sla_twamp.html
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:47 AM Mark Feit <> wrote:
>
> HADJALI Mehdi writes:
>
>
>
> I would like to know if it’s possible to run a throughput/latency test (via
> pscheduler command) between a perfsonar server and, for example, a cisco
> switch.
>
>
>
> When I have launched a task between this 2 instances, I have this type of
> error : “owping returned an error: owping: FILE=owping.c, LINE=1757,
> Unable to open control connection to [ipdest]:861.”
>
>
>
> Throughput requires that the device at the far end has pScheduler installed
> and running. There has been some work toward embedding perfSONAR in
> routers and switches; check with your vendor to see if they support it.
>
>
>
> Latency can be run to any device that runs an OWAMP or TWAMP server. A
> number of vendors support TWAMP; you can force pScheduler to use that
> instead of OWAMP by specifying the twping tool (see
> https://docs.perfsonar.net/pscheduler_client_tasks.html#selecting-tool-s-for-tasks).
>
>
>
> --Mark
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list:
> https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/signoff/perfsonar-user
- [perfsonar-user] Tests btw perfsonar & network device, HADJALI Mehdi, 04/29/2020
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Tests btw perfsonar & network device, Mark Feit, 04/29/2020
- Re: [perfsonar-user] [External] Re: Tests btw perfsonar & network device, Hunter Fuller, 04/29/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.