Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - [perfsonar-user] Possibly dependency error in pscheduler-server-1.1.6-2.el7.noarch package?

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

[perfsonar-user] Possibly dependency error in pscheduler-server-1.1.6-2.el7.noarch package?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jim Nauer CWRU <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [perfsonar-user] Possibly dependency error in pscheduler-server-1.1.6-2.el7.noarch package?
  • Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:05:31 -0400

I'm building a new (internal-only) pS node, using our local baseline install of RHEL 7 instead of CentOS 7, and ran into an interesting dependency error:

--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Error: Package: pscheduler-server-1.1.6-2.el7.noarch (perfSONAR)

           Requires: python-flask


Checking on one of our "netintall" (CentOS 7) versions of pS, I can see that:

1) python-flask v. 0.10 was installed from the CentOS "extras" repository

2) but there is ALSO a package called "python-Flask" (note the capital 'F') in the perfSONAR repository which is NOT installed (but is a slightly newer version, 0.11 vs. 0.10 in both CentOS & RHEL 7 "Extras" repos).

Is is possible that the dependencies for pscheduler-server-1.1.6-2.el7.noarch were mis-typed and should be "python-Flask" with a capital F, or that the "python-Flask" RPM in the perfSONAR repository should have been named "python-flask" so that it would override the older but same-name package in the CentOS repository?

  --Jim

--
James A. Nauer                   | "I shall not yield one whit of  maturity,
Engineer III, Enterprise Systems | not grace, not respectability, to  the
University Technology, [U]Tech   | passing of time. I declare that I  shall
Case Western Reserve University  | forever be, if not a child,  certainly
(216) 368-MACS  (368-6227)       | childish"  --Kennet Shardik
USPA D-25604




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page