perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Antoine Delvaux <>
- To: Jeff White <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 15:01:32 +0000
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
> Le 23 mai 2017 à 22:59, Jeff White
> <>
> a écrit :
>
> With PS 4.0 and pscheduler, is there a way to run a throughout test without
> installing Perfsonar's whole stack including a Web server? Essentially
> what I am looking for is a way to run a throughput test from any CentOS 7
> system in my cluster and not just my Perfsonar node. I'm fine with
> installing whatever packages are needed, but trying to avoid httpd and
> other daemons which I then have to disable.
It might be too obvious, and it depends on your actual use case, but you
could also just have the iperf daemon, or `iperf -s`, running on each of
these cluster system with a restrictive iptable firewall in place so that
only other hosts in your cluster can use it.
With that you can do whatever iperf measurements you want to do to and from
any other host of your cluster. But this won't archive nor plot anything.
Maybe a pscheduler to iperf only measurement, with proper archiving from the
pscheduler host, would help making this a more viable solution. And probably
that's what Mark was thinking about.
Antoine.
- [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Jeff White, 05/23/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Mark Feit, 05/23/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Mark Feit, 05/24/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Tim Chown, 05/25/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Brian Tierney, 05/25/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Mark Feit, 05/25/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Tim Chown, 05/25/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Mark Feit, 05/24/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Mark Feit, 05/23/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Minimum packages needed for ad-hoc throughput testing, Antoine Delvaux, 05/24/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.