perfsonar-user - [perfsonar-user] RE: Clock stability on VM
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: "Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE)" <>
- To: Purna Mididuddi <>, "" <>
- Subject: [perfsonar-user] RE: Clock stability on VM
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:57:01 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, de-DE, en-US
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hi Purna,
I believe you are looking for comments from the community and not inquiring us for support on perfSONAR.
Generally I agree and have also seen very stable system clocks on virtual machines.
Regards,
Ivan Garnizov
GEANT SA1T2: pS deployments GN Operations
GEANT SA2T3: pS development team
GEANT SA3T5: eduPERT team
-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Purna Mididuddi
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 09:53
To:
Cc: Purna Mididuddi
Subject: [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM
From: [] On Behalf Of Purna Mididuddi
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 09:53
To:
Cc: Purna Mididuddi
Subject: [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM
Hi,
As mentioned in the documentation, clock stability and accuracy are very important for tests like latency measurement.
We are looking to run a perfsonar node on a VM, with dedicated NIC, dedicated CPU cores and disabling VM swapping. Also we are running NTP on the VM. Given these, can we assume clock on VM will be accurate? If not, what other factors will play a role in
VM environment that aren't in bare-metal case.
The "ntpq -p" output on VM shows the offset column is changing slightly over a period. But same behavior is seen on bare-metal output too. So, how can we say baremetal has more clock accuracy than VM?
On VM:
---------
root@VM:~# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
+chronos.asda.gr .GPS. 1 u 55 64 177 231.542 -13.305 7.205
-tick.ucla.edu .GPS. 1 u 57 64 177 28.798 -1.070 4.894
+ntp.itl.waw.pl .ATOM. 1 u 50 64 177 203.149 -7.759 2.650
-saturn.es.net .CDMA. 1 u 58 64 177 24.740 1.389 2.615
*tempus1.gum.gov .PPS. 1 u 57 64 177 204.282 -11.470 5.082
root@VM:~#
root@VM:~#
root@VM:~# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
-chronos.asda.gr .GPS. 1 u 136 256 377 231.800 -15.517 3.405
+tick.ucla.edu .GPS. 1 u 85 256 377 29.182 -0.619 1.417
+ntp.itl.waw.pl .ATOM. 1 u 166 256 377 203.748 -9.379 0.435
*saturn.es.net .CDMA. 1 u 221 256 377 25.082 -0.908 1.344
-tempus1.gum.gov .PPS. 1 u 142 256 377 204.425 -10.678 0.749
On bare-metal:
-----------------
root@HOST:~# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
eth-0.nms-rlat. .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
nms-rlat.hous.n .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
nms-rlat.losa.n .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
eth-1.nms-rlat. .INIT. 16 u - 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
+chronos.es.net .CDMA. 1 u 59 64 177 89.979 10.674 5.734
*saturn.es.net .CDMA. 1 u 57 64 177 24.547 10.046 5.885
root@HOST:~#
root@HOST:~#
root@HOST:~# ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
nms-rlat.chic.n .INIT. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
eth-1.nms-rlat. .INIT. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
eth-1.nms-rlat. .INIT. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
nms-rlat.newy32 .INIT. 16 u - 512 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
+chronos.es.net .CDMA. 1 u 59 64 377 90.446 4.540 6.255
*saturn.es.net .CDMA. 1 u 59 64 377 24.889 -4.279 5.590
- [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM, Purna Mididuddi, 12/14/2016
- [perfsonar-user] RE: Clock stability on VM, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 12/14/2016
- [perfsonar-user] RE: Clock stability on VM, Purna Mididuddi, 12/15/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM, Mark Feit, 12/14/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM, Purna Mididuddi, 12/15/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM, Mark Feit, 12/15/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Clock stability on VM, Purna Mididuddi, 12/15/2016
- [perfsonar-user] RE: Clock stability on VM, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 12/14/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.