perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Bill Owens <>
- To: Mark Feit <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:31:44 -0500
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:40:53PM +0000, Mark Feit wrote:
> Bill Owens writes:
> >
> >This morning's round of updates is failing because it appears that a
> >dependency is asking for an install of
> >python-jinja2 2.7.2-2.el7, which is a downgrade from the already installed
> >2-2.8-1.el7. I'm not sure which
> >pS package is causing the issue, nor why a downgrade is needed; is there a
> >way to check where the
> >dependency comes from?
>
> The software behind the REST API was written using the Flask framework,
> which depends on Jinja2 and another package called Werkzeug. I’d packaged
> up versions of all three as part of our own distribution, but it turns out
> that Red Hat had done the same thing with a slight difference: the first
> letter in the package names were lowercase (python-jinja2 vs.
> python-Jinja2). The uppercase versions met Red Hat’s naming guidelines, so
> I have no idea why they went lowercase, but they did.
>
> To make a long story short, Matt Woodward had installed SaltStack on one of
> his systems, and there ended up being a conflict between jinja2 and Jinja2.
> (See messages in this thread from October 31 and November 14.) Because of
> a quirk in the way YUM behaves, we had to do a set of the three
> uppercase-named packages with no files in them to make for a hands-off
> transition during an upgrade. It went off without a hitch in the test bed,
> so it was released into the staging build.
>
> Nothing in pS depends on anything other than python-flask, which depends on
> the other two packages. If you can supply the exact error messages and let
> me know if your system has anything other than the toolkit installed, I’ll
> see what I can do to figure the situation out. None of this will be in the
> 4.0 release, so new installations and upgrades from 3.5.x won’t have this
> problem.
>
> See also https://github.com/perfsonar/pscheduler/issues/215
>
Okay, since this isn't something that needs to be fixed for the release I
just brute-forced it by using RPM to remove the Jinja2 package (keeping the
dependencies) and letting yum repair things. Everything seems to be happy
with that...
Thanks,
Bill.
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/02/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Matthew Woodward, 11/14/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/14/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/17/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/17/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/17/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/18/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/28/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/28/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Laurie Zirkle, 11/28/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/28/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/28/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/28/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/17/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/17/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Matthew Woodward, 11/14/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.