perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread

From: Mark Feit <>
To: "" <>
Cc: Andrew Lake <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 22:07:32 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: nysernet.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nysernet.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:0

Bill Owens writes:
>
> Thanks! Any idea what might be going on with the A vs. AAAA issue? Is there
> perhaps just something missing from
> the ability to handle IPv6? I saw Andy's patch a couple of days back for a
> different v6-related issue, and it appeared
> to involve pulling in a new Perl module, but I haven't tried that to see
> whether it would affect my problem.

At first glance, this looked like it was a problem with the validator that
pScheduler uses against all incoming JSON. I tested the IP address against
the validator and it (correctly) passed. Andy’s looking into whether it
might be meshconfig-related.

--Mark

Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/02/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Matthew Woodward, 11/14/2016
  - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/14/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/17/2016
  - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/17/2016
    - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/17/2016
      - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/18/2016
      - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/28/2016
        
        Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/28/2016
        
        Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Laurie Zirkle, 11/28/2016
        
        Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Bill Owens, 11/28/2016
        
        Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread, Mark Feit, 11/28/2016

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR 4.0 RC1 CentOS 7 testing thread