perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Brian Candler <>
- To:
- Cc: "Eschen, Brian" <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:01 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to :references:cc:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rfs8zZzKeH/uR3cxLls49baC9IHe0OV3 JAOnCgbKhw5BGiBTc+2b3d8SwLzaYKu3x59kZjtXdKJw3q4APznPATheEzeddivU MMB40ZDH/sgkpSPFpJOKH5snDyZeZ96BI7NZH5tMahmkmuZfyfZo4ocpa/q1f12O WdqsvEA8zlk=
On 25/06/2016 15:23, Brian Tierney
wrote:
By "smaller buffer" do you mean smaller TCP window size? But if that's what's limiting the throughput, wouldn't packet drops / retransmissions be observed?
|
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Tierney, 06/20/2016
- Re: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Candler, 06/20/2016
- RE: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 06/21/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Candler, 06/21/2016
- Re: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Tierney, 06/25/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Candler, 06/26/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Tierney, 06/27/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Candler, 06/26/2016
- RE: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 06/21/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Michael Smitasin, 06/20/2016
- Re: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems, Brian Candler, 06/20/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.