Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Brian Candler <>
  • To: "Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE)" <>, "" <>, "Eschen, Brian" <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] TCP window size problems
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:43:39 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to :references:cc:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Kbvw/t OynoNyzwRdxTrgs8s5wdHFhmDBVnQqN/cSbYsX7z+ho8rFhJyrR5Di3IbC0natFT Cre72/X4t9nHpa2eE38LrRIuNMjDFaXxAV5nouRY/2OT6aEoMr3Z6rMqKC6dw8/R WrcKRAZhi3Wo+WWRvuDr8N0FwcLonverRooSI=

On 21/06/2016 09:31, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE) wrote:
Here are my 50 cents in this interesting thread.
It is not necessary to see retransmits in cases where a congestion management is
applied (as Brian referred to it "smaller buffer").
He pointed that this is a pattern for an intermediate device being
overwhelmed. That alone suggests that on one side of the connection there is
a router, which on a certain threshold starts sending flow control messages
to the toolkit to slow down. This does not even mean the router is
overwhelmed with traffic. It means the router sees the possibility of being
congested and immediately sends control messages to one party to reduce the
size of the window.
By "flow control messages" do you mean TCP ECN? (As opposed to, say, ICMP source quench, or ethernet flow control, or some other mechanism)

ECN is a possibility. However it doesn't explain why the OP was able to overcome the limit by using the -w flag to set a different window size.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page