perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc

From: Stephen Fromm <>
To: "Manglos\, Andrew P \(173E\)" <>, "perfsonar-user\@internet2.edu" <>
Cc: "perfsonar-developer\@internet2.edu" <>
Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:25:08 -0800

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 14:59:05 -0800, Manglos, Andrew P (173E) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has used an Intel Nuc for iperf testing? I
> noticed that it is mentioned on the low cost hardware page but did not see
> any reference of testing on these devices.

We have a number of NUCs deployed with perfsonar and have no
complaints.

--
Stephen Fromm
Network for Education and Research in Oregon

[perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Manglos, Andrew P (173E), 02/09/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, John W. O'Brien, 02/10/2016
  - Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Hervey Allen, 02/10/2016
    - RE: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Manglos, Andrew P (173E), 02/10/2016
      - RE: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Chevalier, Scott S, 02/10/2016
      - Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Hervey Allen, 02/10/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Stephen Fromm, 02/10/2016

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc