perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc

From: "John W. O'Brien" <>
To: "Manglos, Andrew P (173E)" <>, "" <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 23:06:59 -0500
Authentication-results: internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;internet2.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=upenn.edu;
Organization: UPenn ISC TS NERD
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23

On 2/9/16 5:59 PM, Manglos, Andrew P (173E) wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has used an Intel Nuc for iperf testing? I
> noticed that it is mentioned on the low cost hardware page but did not
> see any reference of testing on these devices.

I have not, but I am the proud owner of multiple NUCs, and would be glad
to give it a whirl. Are there test that are of specific interest to you?

--
John W. O'Brien
Senior Network Engineer
Information Systems and Computing
University of Pennsylvania

215-898-9818
OpenPGP key ID: 0x155016CB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Manglos, Andrew P (173E), 02/09/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, John W. O'Brien, 02/10/2016
  - Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Hervey Allen, 02/10/2016
    - RE: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Manglos, Andrew P (173E), 02/10/2016
      - RE: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Chevalier, Scott S, 02/10/2016
      - Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Hervey Allen, 02/10/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc, Stephen Fromm, 02/10/2016

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] Low Cost Hardware-Intel Nuc