perfsonar-user - RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions
Chronological Thread
- From: Hyojoon Kim <>
- To: "Chevalier, Scott S" <>, Daniel Doyle <>
- Cc: Larry Blunk <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 01:12:51 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Hello Dan & Scott,
Thank you for sharing your experience and insight! We have several low-cost nodes on Cubox i4-pro, which are currently serving well as latency measurement points, but we need more nodes that can do bandwidth tests.
We will definitely let you know the box we choose and any experience with it. It is likely that we will play safe, sticking with the LIVA X 2GB/32GB storage model :-)
Thanks,
Joon
From: Chevalier, Scott S []
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:12 PM To: Daniel Doyle; Hyojoon Kim Cc: Larry Blunk; Subject: RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions Joon,
As Dan has already mentioned the 2G Liva-X model should be able to perform as a 1G testpoint. My personal experience with the LIVA’s have been with the base BAT-mini model and our internal testing shows those testing at around 940Mbps.
There are several community members using the BAT-mini LIVAs with varying degrees of success. Personally, I have had a failure rate of 2 per 15 or so and have had some other production issues; power button/boot-up instability for instance. The LIVA boxes are also limited to the Debian/Ubuntu pS packages. (http://docs.perfsonar.net/low_cost_nodes.html)
With that in mind there are other devices which have been under-going some limited testing and showing great promise, in the same price range as the 4G LIVA-X model. The second generation NUC and the Zotac Zbox are really solid platforms, offering additional port availability, expandable memory and drive options (the base node does not come with memory/drive, so additional shopping is required), and OS flexibility (able to use the more community-supported CentOS ISO packages).
Regardless of which devices you end up choosing, please let us know how the small nodes end up working for your deployment and any issues you encounter along the way.
Thanks,
Scott Chevalier Network Systems Analyst 812-856-9964
From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Daniel Doyle
Joon,
From my own experiences, I have been using the 2G LIVA X model for testing and it seems to work just fine. The 4G model might be more futureproof (and I think it comes with more disk space, which might be relevant if you're doing more), but these are unlikely to be long long term things anyway and will be superseded at some point in the future by some new shiny. Since these nodes aren't intended to be running the MA or the UI or anything their resource needs are rather modest by today's standards.
Others' opinions may vary, but I'd go with the cheaper of the two especially if you're getting multiples.
My 2c, -Dan
Dan Doyle GlobalNOC Software Developer 1-812-856-3892
|
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Hyojoon Kim, 12/08/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Daniel Doyle, 12/08/2015
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Chevalier, Scott S, 12/08/2015
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Hyojoon Kim, 12/09/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Mark Feit, 12/09/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Hyojoon Kim, 12/09/2015
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Chevalier, Scott S, 12/08/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Inexpensive testing nodes - LIVA in particular hardware questions, Daniel Doyle, 12/08/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.