perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Different MTU sizes in hosts
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Matthew J Zekauskas <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Different MTU sizes in hosts
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:31:06 -0400
- Authentication-results: internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
- Blupr08mb1172: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted
- Blupr08mb424: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted
If you are talking about a TCP throughput test, and the MTUs are set
correctly on the host interfaces, TCP should negotiate the lower MSS
(max segment size) for transmission. I don't believe it is
user-specifiable on the individual tests. Note that if there are
tunnels, then the 1500 MTU may be larger than the biggest actual MTU
of the path. It could be worth limiting the window size to throttle the connection to 1GE in the 10->1 direction if there isn't enough buffer space to deal with a burst of data arriving at 10GE at the bottleneck. (...or if you find that throughput is bad in that direction, then playing with the window size could confirm a buffer issue.) --Matt, with a quick answer which others will no doubt elaborate on On 7/16/15 2:10 PM, Alex Moura wrote:
Hello, Quick question: is a case where one perfSONAR host does have 10GbE port with MTU set to 9000 bytes and the other side host does have 1GbE port set to 1500 bytes MTU, how one should set the parameters to run a throughput test on each side? Thanks! Alex |
- [perfsonar-user] Different MTU sizes in hosts, Alex Moura, 07/16/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Different MTU sizes in hosts, Matthew J Zekauskas, 07/16/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Different MTU sizes in hosts, Alex Moura, 07/16/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Different MTU sizes in hosts, Matthew J Zekauskas, 07/16/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.