perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] TWAMP
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Robert Shearman <>
- To: Aaron Brown <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] TWAMP
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:11:01 +0000
Hi Aaron,
On 23/12/14 19:40, Aaron Brown wrote:
Hey Robert,
On Dec 23, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Robert Shearman
<>
wrote:
I've got an RFC-compliant implementation of TWAMP working based on the
owamp code.
Would patches along these lines be likely to be accepted into owamp? Any
guidelines on coding style, or other pitfalls to avoid?
We’d definitely be interested in the patches. As long as they’re broken up
into somewhat discrete pieces, and not just a giant patch, we’ll be happy to
take a look.
Any feedback on the patches submitted for this?
For the benefit of the list, the patches are available here:
https://code.google.com/r/robertshearman-owamp/source/list?name=twamp
Thanks,
Rob
- Re: [perfsonar-user] TWAMP, Robert Shearman, 02/20/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.