perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Daniel Doyle <>]

Hello again,

Thanks for everyone that has responded so far - the feedback has been very helpful and illuminating. 

This is a reminder to anyone that saw this email and put it on their TODO list but haven't gotten around to it yet. We would like to close the survey a week from now on Wedn, Feb 4th so that we can compile and integrate all the feedback into our timeline.

Thanks again,

-pS Small Node Team

On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Daniel Doyle <> wrote:

Hello all,

As part of the current perfSONAR development efforts, we are investigating what we are calling "small node" support. Generally speaking these small nodes are cheap, small form factor devices intended to run tests and/or take part in meshes but without running the entire stack such as the toolkit GUI or the Esmond MA. 

Our end goal is that by providing a well supported small node option we can enable institutions to deploy more of these perfSONAR enabled devices without breaking the bank, which in turn leads to better networks. To help reach that goal, the perfSONAR team has put together a short survey to see which aspects of a small node are most important to you so that we can ensure our efforts are going into the right places.

If you are interested in small nodes (or not, that's helpful too!) it would be great if you could take a few minutes and fill out this survey, located at the following URL: 

http://goo.gl/forms/O4R36WlO18

Also, please feel free to share this with anyone else that may be interested.

Thanks!

Dan Doyle

GlobalNOC Software Developer

1-812-856-3892

Dan Doyle

GlobalNOC Software Developer

1-812-856-3892

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail