Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] OSX error: Invalid data record (seq_no too large)

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] OSX error: Invalid data record (seq_no too large)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Brian Candler <>
  • To: Aaron Brown <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] OSX error: Invalid data record (seq_no too large)
  • Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:46:36 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JVdTHq zkCM9y5AxuveAzcjLCzsEWafPS2xjbVR+yySxpU/M1GZSiO4bKP1laue6t93ZoEj tn9+ky6PpE6BfSwHVCj7LyfkD5ViqT1EJpZGuKftY8ySONMQlYP/O5mAeKDJcGyH 0JT085i1k2Ze7qCuK35zZRtsbzNaKXUcgM+J8=

On 01/12/2014 13:05, Aaron Brown wrote:
That error is usually caused by the clocks being too far offset. How far off
are the two hosts from each other time-wise? Is the VM instance running NTP?
If I run "date" on both boxes they seem to be within a second of each other.

The VM is perfsonar running inside VirtualBox inside my laptop. The OSX instance is my laptop itself.

On Perfsonar VM:

$ ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
www.bhay.org 145.238.203.14 2 u 60 64 3 6.003 -1.878 0.492
*golem.canonical 131.188.3.220 2 u 26 64 1 6.554 0.065 1.296

On OSX:

$ ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
time.euro.apple 17.72.133.55 2 u 253m 512 1 164.282 6.436 917.154

(hmm, no asterisk, is that in sync? If not, why not?)

Regards,

Brian.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page