perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Aaron Brown <>
- To: Roderick Mooi <>
- Cc: Pete Siemsen <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:51:59 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Hey Roderick,
On Nov 10, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Roderick Mooi
<>
wrote:
> Hi Aaron
>
> 1. Does this mean that bwping support isn't included in 3.4 yet?
bwping is in there, but the GUI doesn’t configure bwping tests.
> 2. Is it possible to utilise bwping via the mesh config?
You should be able to add: "force_bwctl_owamp 1” to the
agent_configuration.conf in the mesh configuration, and have it do bwping
tests instead of powstream. However, it’s only been lightly tested :)
Cheers,
Aaron
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roderick
>
>>>> On 2014-11-06 at 16:04, Aaron Brown
>>>> <>
>>>> wrote:
>> Hey Pete,
>>
>> On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Pete Siemsen
>> <<mailto:>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> perfSONAR 3.4 supports hosts with 2 network interfaces in such a way
> that
>> you can run bandwidth tests on one interface and latency tests on the
> other,
>> without conflict. Cool.
>>
>> A buddy attended the recent Technology Exchange conference, where he
> heard
>> that 3.4 will schedule tests in sequence, so that you don't have to
> worry
>> about conflicts even if your host has just one interface.
>>
>> The online docs for 3.4.1 still recommend using separate interfaces
> or
>> hosts. So I think 3.4 doesn't solve the conflicting bandwidth/latency
> issue.
>>
>> Correct?
>>
>> Right now, the web GUI configuration only supports doing the separate
>
>> interfaces, not co-scheduling. However, you can manually configure
> the tests
>> to support co-scheduling the two, though, that’s been less well
> tested, and
>> would be a bit less accurate. If you’d like to try that out, I can
> put
>> together some documentation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions,
>> legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
>> The full disclaimer details can be found at
>> http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
>>
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>> MailScanner,
>> and is believed to be clean.
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> --
> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions,
> e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
> The full disclaimer details can be found at
> http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner,
> and is believed to be clean.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
- [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Pete Siemsen, 11/05/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/06/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Pete Siemsen, 11/07/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/07/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/07/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Roderick Mooi, 11/10/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/10/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.