perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: "Roderick Mooi" <>
- To: "Aaron Brown" <>, "Pete Siemsen" <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:26:15 +0200
Hi Aaron
1. Does this mean that bwping support isn't included in 3.4 yet?
2. Is it possible to utilise bwping via the mesh config?
Thanks,
Roderick
>>> On 2014-11-06 at 16:04, Aaron Brown
>>> <>
>>> wrote:
> Hey Pete,
>
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Pete Siemsen
> <<mailto:>>
> wrote:
>
> perfSONAR 3.4 supports hosts with 2 network interfaces in such a way
that
> you can run bandwidth tests on one interface and latency tests on the
other,
> without conflict. Cool.
>
> A buddy attended the recent Technology Exchange conference, where he
heard
> that 3.4 will schedule tests in sequence, so that you don't have to
worry
> about conflicts even if your host has just one interface.
>
> The online docs for 3.4.1 still recommend using separate interfaces
or
> hosts. So I think 3.4 doesn't solve the conflicting bandwidth/latency
issue.
>
> Correct?
>
> Right now, the web GUI configuration only supports doing the separate
> interfaces, not co-scheduling. However, you can manually configure
the tests
> to support co-scheduling the two, though, that’s been less well
tested, and
> would be a bit less accurate. If you’d like to try that out, I can
put
> together some documentation.
>
> Cheers,
> Aaron
>
>
> --
> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions,
> legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
> The full disclaimer details can be found at
> http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner,
> and is believed to be clean.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
--
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail
legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
The full disclaimer details can be found at
http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
- [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Pete Siemsen, 11/05/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/06/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Pete Siemsen, 11/07/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/07/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/07/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Roderick Mooi, 11/10/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Aaron Brown, 11/10/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] are BWCTL and OWAMP scheduled separately in 3.4?, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 11/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.