perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Aaron Brown <>
- To: Alex Moura <>
- Cc: "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:53:49 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Hey Alex,
On Aug 6, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Alex Moura
<>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (nutttcp newbie here)
>
> Which would be the equivalent for the bwctl iperf3 command for a similar
> test using nuttcp?
>
> bwctl -4 -x -o -T iperf3 -c <host> -i 1 -t 20 -w 20M -u -b 600M
>
>
> Would it be like this?
>
> bwctl -4 -x -o -T nuttp -c <host> -i 1 -t 20 -w 20M -u -b 600M
Right now, nuttcp udp tests are not supported, but I can’t remember why that
limitation is in place. I’ll do some testing to see if it can be removed.
> A secondary question: is the -o parameter a bad practice for iperf3/nuttcp
> tests using NTP Stratum 1/2 hosts?
The -o parameter just tells the receiver to connect to the sender (normally
the sending host connects to the receiving host) so it shouldn’t have any
effect on the host.
Cheers,
Aaron
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
- [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl, Alex Moura, 08/06/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl, Aaron Brown, 08/07/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.