Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Aaron Brown <>
  • To: Alex Moura <>
  • Cc: "" <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] iperf3 / nuttcp tests using bwctl
  • Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:53:49 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

Hey Alex,

On Aug 6, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Alex Moura
<>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> (nutttcp newbie here)
>
> Which would be the equivalent for the bwctl iperf3 command for a similar
> test using nuttcp?
>
> bwctl -4 -x -o -T iperf3 -c <host> -i 1 -t 20 -w 20M -u -b 600M
>
>
> Would it be like this?
>
> bwctl -4 -x -o -T nuttp -c <host> -i 1 -t 20 -w 20M -u -b 600M

Right now, nuttcp udp tests are not supported, but I can’t remember why that
limitation is in place. I’ll do some testing to see if it can be removed.

> A secondary question: is the -o parameter a bad practice for iperf3/nuttcp
> tests using NTP Stratum 1/2 hosts?

The -o parameter just tells the receiver to connect to the sender (normally
the sending host connects to the receiving host) so it shouldn’t have any
effect on the host.

Cheers,
Aaron

>
> Thanks,
> Alex




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page