perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

["Nina Jeliazkova" <>]

Hi Frederic,

Frederic LOUI 
<>
 wrote:

> Hi Nina,
> 
> Hope you're doing well.
> The RRD-MA 2.0 RC1 web services we have installed here should be OK.
> ( RRD data collection from our side has been also resumed ;-)   )
> 

Great :)

> Meanwhile, could you please remove RENATER-test entry from the MA.conf ?
> And replace the old official RENATER entry by this one ? (Which is the 
> 2.0RC1 that enters "production"  status)
> The official one should be: perfsonar.renater.fr
 
Done.

> 
> 
> I also noticed the possibility to use other MA.conf file in the 
> resources dialog box.
> Thank for that ! I won't bother you if I need additional test with an 
> other MA !

This was a popular request, hope the improved GUI will make testing of new
services easier :)

> Some discrepancies are still present, but we are working from our side 
> to correct and polish the results.
> 
> I don't know if you have much RRD-MA2.0RC1 in production (baby-sitting 
> phase :-) ),
> but feel free to :
> 
> Use our MA as a testing "feed" for PerfSONARUI

thanks, we will.

> contact me should you notice any issues or errors from our side.
> 
> The goal is to perform as much as test with different domain, so some 
> issues/bugs might appear ...
> (Not on PerfSONARUI but also in RRD-MA or even RRD-DATA collection)
> 
> These errors can be collected and analyzed, part of a FAQ or known issue 
> related to the whole chain.
> 
> Also you can activate the RENATER RRD-MA by default. This service should 
> be always up.

Yes, the Renater entry is not commented anymore.

Best regards,
Nina