perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Warren Matthews <>
- To: Szymon Trocha <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:11:38 -0400
Hi
When I say "java" - I don't just mean the java programming language, I
mean the entire java environment, and to me at least that includes
configuring tomcat etc.
I'm not disparaging perfSONAR. I'm keen to use it. However, to me it is
a hurdle I have to climb.
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:32 +0200, Szymon Trocha wrote:
> Warren Matthews wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I hate to whine but Eric and Jeff say I should call it feedback and send
> > it to the list.
> >
> > We've had a terrible time with perfSONAR. I want to give up. Actually we
> > haven't even made it to trying to install perfSONAR. We haven't even got
> > the prerequisites installed yet.
> >
> > The real problem is we have no java expertise. I'm trying to get another
> > student but that'll be at least a few more weeks. The other problem is
> > we have to run RHEL. It is mandated by our director; Unfortunately our
> > site license does not include the application server channel, so we
> > don't get tomcat. Frankly, we're also not really interested in
> > understanding the packages and being experts on various server software
> > tools. We're network support staff, we want to measure and trouble-shoot
> > the network. Trying to get perfSONAR set up has been a real pain.
> >
> > Perhaps you will say we should wait for better documentation. But we
> > would like to be an early adopter because we need to offer monitoring
> > services for our global campus. I would like to use perfSONAR so in
> > future we can use data from other networks. Furthermore I claim most
> > network admins are not going to try as hard as we did. If it doesn't
> > just work they won't use it.
>
> Hi Warren,
>
> First of all thank you for your feedback as it is really important to us.
>
> But I think I didn't understand where the problem was. Weak
> documentation is one thing. It's clear but we are improving it
> constantly. You didn't mention specific points you had problem with. Why
> did you need Java expert for installation? If you don't have Tomcat you
> don't have one of the perfSONAR installation prerequisites. I wouldn't
> make it an accusation against perfSONAR.
>
> So if you could summarize specific points where the improvement is
> needed we would appreciate it. Now I think it's too much general.
>
> Best regards
- experiences from gatech, Warren Matthews, 08/17/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Szymon Trocha, 08/17/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Warren Matthews, 08/18/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/17/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Rafael Costa, 08/17/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Chris Welti, 08/18/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Warren Matthews, 08/18/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Rafael Costa, 08/17/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Chris Welti, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Roman Lapacz, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Chris Welti, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Nicolas Simar, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Roman Lapacz, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Loukik Kudarimoti, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Roman Lapacz, 08/18/2006
- Re: [I2G2-Proto] [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Roman Lapacz, 08/18/2006
- Re: [perfsonar-user] experiences from gatech, Szymon Trocha, 08/17/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.