Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Renaming (java) ls-client-api

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] Renaming (java) ls-client-api


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Bischoff <>
  • To: Krzysztof Jędrzejewski <>
  • Cc: Antoine Delvaux <>, perfSONAR developers <>
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Renaming (java) ls-client-api
  • Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:56:32 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WFprl+EAg8vkPzpaU31PPogYYg3Xo5zL05ENqf7Oq2U7Lc0fgeADFNEU3u01T4Pb90 upoNfzCBswYEXlr9dErcBOqdSG7m6rnqbTCJvWHJevs5/zAY1w6qmqUpRkPit5cEpdk+ JaaF9UhIfJdkaKMBwJ/+vXwU2wmwKAUNLFtY0=

Krzysztof Jędrzejewski wrote:
Antoine Delvaux pisze:
Well, from what I can understand of it (it's hard to find my way in the svn repo/source code), I'd say that Michael's proposition makes things less ambiguous:

ls-discovery-api
ls-registration-api

And then a couple of questions to better understand:
- How would would you like to proceed i.e. who does what?
- Possible impact on any other development?

Good questions. What are the services currently using this API?
So let it be ls-discovery-api.
I don't know anything about services using this API. Only PerfsonarUI uses it I think.

Regards
It is expected that services will use the api in the future. I'm also not
aware of any ps services currently using it. Likely use-case is that a
service will lookup topo-service for configuration of the service itself.
Other possible use-cases of the top of my head are:
- to find a lookup service to register themselves against :-)
(or some other form of auto configuration)
- to find cooperating services that contain information for drilling down
(though this might be something that could be handled in the client layer)
- to find other services that the services can use for collecting/processing
data.
etc.

As far as proceeding on that front - it is probobably something that needs
to get discussed face-to-face and initially prepared by a group of ppl. The
scope of this also extends beyond the European/java-ls-api effort.

as far as ls-registration-api part, that befalls the psbase2 effort and
improving loose coupling between parts of the psbase2 which afaik
is already a ongoing process.

Regards,
Michael



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page