perfsonar development work

[Slawomir Trzaszczka <>]

Hi,

this is my proposition of the eventTypes (result codes) hierarchy. 
This "pictures" describes only piece of the hierarchy. 

I would like to present you 2 kinds of hierarchy :

1) EventTypes are grouped by TYPE OF SERVICE (see success branch)

http://perfsonar.net /
                     |
                     |----result/
                               |                      
                               |
                               |
                               |
                               |---success/
                               |          |-- ls/
                               |          |    |
                               |          |    |-- register
                               |          |    |-- deregister
                               |          |     
                               |          |-- ma/
                               |          |    | 
                               |          |    |-- whatever1
                               |          |    |-- whatever2
                               |          |
                               |          |-- mp/
                               |          |     |
                               |          |     |-- whatever3
                               |          |     |-- whatever4
                               |          |
                               |          |-- echo
                               |          |
                               |          |-- ...
                               |
                               |---  error/
                               |          |
                               |          |--..
                               |


2) EventTypes are grouped by FUNCTIONALITY (not by service type)


http://perfsonar.net /
                     |
                     |----result/
                               |                      
                               |
                               |
                               |
                               |---success/
                               |          |    
                               |          |-- register
                               |          |-- deregister
                               |          |-- echo
                               |          |-- storage
                               |          |-- other functionality 
                               |          |-- ...
                               |
                               |---  error/
                               |          |
                               |          |--..
                               |


We should make a decision which type 1 or 2 will be more useful for us. 

What do you think about it ? Any advices and opinion will be helpful. 


List of the EventTypes (result codes) which I've found is here :

https://wiki.man.poznan.pl/perfsonar-mdm/index.php/Result_code_hierarchy


Thanks,

Slawomir 


On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 10:08 +0200, Slawomir Trzaszczka wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> I would like to ask you few questions about eventTypes format. 
> Some times ago it was a discussion about eventTypes format. The common 
> decision was URL format for eventTypes in requests and responses
> (example below)
> 
> ----------------
> EXAMPLE
> 
> echo for LookupService 
> 
> old version - dotted notation eventType
> 
> <nmwg:metadata id="resultCodeMetadata">
>     <nmwg:eventType>success.echo</nmwg:eventType>
> </nmwg:metadata>
> 
> new version - URL notation
> 
> <nmwg:metadata id="result-code">
> <nmwg:eventType>http://perfsonar.net/result/success/echo</nmwg:eventType>
> </nmwg:metadata>
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> After discussion with Jason we decided that we have to  define eventType
> hierarchy together. So What is your proposal of this hierarchy ?.
> 
> 
> I send you links with eventTypes hierarchy in old 'dotted' version and
> hierarchy of it in some services :
> 
> examples of the eventTypes in services :
> 
> https://wiki.man.poznan.pl/perfsonar-mdm/index.php/Result_code_hierarchy
> 
> hierarchy tree of eventTypes :
> 
> https://wiki.man.poznan.pl/perfsonar-mdm/index.php/Result_code_hierarchy
> 
> 
> I think that we should test our services, apis and check What kind of
> eventTypes do we use. In next release we would like to use only URL
> eventTypes.
> 
> 
> Every proposal for eventTypes hierarchy will be helpful. 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Slawomir
> 
-- 
+--------------------------------------------+
 Slawomir Trzaszczka                       
                                           
 Poznan Supercomputing & Networking Center 
+--------------------------------------------+