perfsonar development work

[Slawomir Trzaszczka <>]

Hi all,


I would like to ask you few questions about eventTypes format. 
Some times ago it was a discussion about eventTypes format. The common 
decision was URL format for eventTypes in requests and responses
(example below)

----------------
EXAMPLE

echo for LookupService 

old version - dotted notation eventType

<nmwg:metadata id="resultCodeMetadata">
    <nmwg:eventType>success.echo</nmwg:eventType>
</nmwg:metadata>

new version - URL notation

<nmwg:metadata id="result-code">
<nmwg:eventType>http://perfsonar.net/result/success/echo</nmwg:eventType>
</nmwg:metadata>

-----------------------------

After discussion with Jason we decided that we have to  define eventType
hierarchy together. So What is your proposal of this hierarchy ?.


I send you links with eventTypes hierarchy in old 'dotted' version and
hierarchy of it in some services :

examples of the eventTypes in services :

https://wiki.man.poznan.pl/perfsonar-mdm/index.php/Result_code_hierarchy

hierarchy tree of eventTypes :

https://wiki.man.poznan.pl/perfsonar-mdm/index.php/Result_code_hierarchy


I think that we should test our services, apis and check What kind of
eventTypes do we use. In next release we would like to use only URL
eventTypes.


Every proposal for eventTypes hierarchy will be helpful. 


Regards,
Slawomir

-- 
+--------------------------------------------+
 Slawomir Trzaszczka                       
                                           
 Poznan Supercomputing & Networking Center 
+--------------------------------------------+