perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Hi Jason,

Thank you for this analysis.

Jason Zurawski pisze:
> The second bug is in the Java hLS:
>
> Because the eventType parameters are used (and only one eventType could 
> ever be present) I am seeing this being registered into the gLS from the 
> Java hLSs:
>
> <nmwg:data>
>   <nmwg:metadata>
>     <summary:subject>
>
>       <nmtb:domain />
>
>       <nmtl3:network />
>
>     </summary:subject>
>     <summary:parameters>
>       <nmwg:parameter name="eventType" />
>     </summary:parameters>
>
> <nmwg:eventType>http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/tools/org/perfsonar/service/lookup/summarization/2.0</nmwg:eventType> 
>
>   </nmwg:metadata>
> </nmwg:data>
>
> The summarization eventType here is unexpected - there should only be 
> 'data' eventTypes in this space (e.g. utilization, errors) and this was 
> causing the Discovery code to ignore them.
>
> Maciej: Just removing the eventType from this message will work for me - 
> when you are able to support multiple eventTypes it can return.

I opened a bug for this issue 
https://bugzilla.perfsonar.net/show_bug.cgi?id=734

Regards,
--
Szymon Trocha

Poznan Supercomputing & Netw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. +48 618582022 ::: http://noc.man.poznan.pl