perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

Maciej;

> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason Zurawski wrote:
> > All;
> >
> > The second bug is in the Java hLS:
> >
> > Because the eventType parameters are used (and only one eventType 
> > could ever be present) I am seeing this being registered into the gLS 
> > from the Java hLSs:
> >
> > <nmwg:data>
> >   <nmwg:metadata>
> >     <summary:subject>
> >
> >       <nmtb:domain />
> >
> >       <nmtl3:network />
> >
> >     </summary:subject>
> >     <summary:parameters>
> >       <nmwg:parameter name="eventType" />
> >     </summary:parameters>
> >
> > <nmwg:eventType>http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/tools/org/perfsonar/service/lookup/summarization/2.0</nmwg:eventType> 
> >
> >   </nmwg:metadata>
> > </nmwg:data>
> >
> > The summarization eventType here is unexpected - there should only be 
> > 'data' eventTypes in this space (e.g. utilization, errors) and this 
> > was causing the Discovery code to ignore them.
>  > Maciej: Just removing the eventType from this message will work for me
>  > when you are able to support multiple eventTypes it can return.
>
> Hmm, I will check it. I think java LS does support multiple event Types 
> as well as multiple parameters with the same name (name="eventType"). 
> For compatibility I was using both.
>
> For sure the new version of the service I am working on now supports it, 
> but it'll not be production one until the end of GN2, so I'll update the 
> current "stable" java LS 1.3.
>
> I don't remember where was the example of summary registration I was 
> basing on. Can you send the correct request and response that I should 
> use? I'll check then where to modify my code.


Example here:

http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/trunk/nmwg/doc/dLS/gLS/phase_1_color.html#appendix_summary

-jason