perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Hi,

Antoine Delvaux pisze:
> Hi All,
>
> Being in the process of setting up the psUI v0.15 testing plan, I had a look 
> at
> the bug listing in https://bugzilla.perfsonar.net/  The list of
> 'resolved/verified but not closed' bugs is quite long: 384, for only 155 
> closed
> bugs.
>
> Is there any specific reasons for not closing those bugs?  This long list
> reduces bugzilla usability forcing us to use very specific queries before
> finding relevant bug listing.

Fully agree. I also urge all developers to put more attention to track 
their bugs (assign status, comment, fix, close). This is one of the 
developers' duty. Then we would not have such situation as described 
above. This is necessary for the smooth operation of the whole activty 
although it takes a bit of time. In GN3 this should be a stronger 
requirement (I think SA4 will have its 2 cents to say here).

> Could I do a massive cleanup on some specific bugs like:
> - all Resolved or Verified bugs with a changed date more than a year ago

ok

> - all bugs for the perfSONAR-core classification (perfSONAR 1.0 version, 
> pre-bundle)

I think we can even delete this category as it doesn't make sense any more.

> Does anybody knows if there's a way to reclassify a product?  I'd like to move
> www.perfsonar.net to 'Management and Infrastructure' where it should belong (I
> think).

done (I have admin rights)

Regards,
--
Szymon Trocha

Poznan Supercomputing & Netw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. +48 618582022 ::: http://noc.man.poznan.pl