perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Verena Venus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am Friday 06 February 2009 14:23:24 schrieb Roman Lapacz:
>   
> > Jason Zurawski wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> >     
> > > > The schema does not have 'throughput' or  'jitter' elements.
> > > >         
> > > Corrected in my doc and the iperf schema in the main pS repo.  Jitter
> > > *should* have been there since this is reported by iperf UDP tests.
> > >
> > > Throughput is more descriptive than 'value' in my opinion (since there
> > > are many 'values' that can be returned by an iperf test).  I have
> > > added throughput to the schema but kept value for now in case VV or
> > > anyone else has a use for it.
> > >
> > > I think we should talk about deprecating the attribute or perhaps
> > > allowing it to stay with a use that will vary by service (I would
> > > prefer the latter).
> > >       
> > The latter is fine for me as well.
> >
> > I've just created RC1 of Java SQL MA v.2.1.1 with iperf stuff and
> > previous schema. On Monday I will create the new one (RC2) with your
> > updates (compatibility has hight priority!).
> >
> >
> > Verena, any comments on changes?
> >
> >     
> It would be nice, if you could send me the new schemata/examples when 
> everything is settled. I can do the changes then very quickly.
>   

I will updated the service and message examples and send them to you on 
Monday.

Roman