perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

Verena Venus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am Friday 06 February 2009 14:23:24 schrieb Roman Lapacz:
> > Jason Zurawski wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > > > The schema does not have 'throughput' or  'jitter' elements.
> > > Corrected in my doc and the iperf schema in the main pS repo.  Jitter
> > > *should* have been there since this is reported by iperf UDP tests.
> > >
> > > Throughput is more descriptive than 'value' in my opinion (since there
> > > are many 'values' that can be returned by an iperf test).  I have
> > > added throughput to the schema but kept value for now in case VV or
> > > anyone else has a use for it.
> > >
> > > I think we should talk about deprecating the attribute or perhaps
> > > allowing it to stay with a use that will vary by service (I would
> > > prefer the latter).
> > The latter is fine for me as well.
> >
> > I've just created RC1 of Java SQL MA v.2.1.1 with iperf stuff and
> > previous schema. On Monday I will create the new one (RC2) with your
> > updates (compatibility has hight priority!).
> >
> >
> > Verena, any comments on changes?
> It would be nice, if you could send me the new schemata/examples when 
> everything is settled. I can do the changes then very quickly.

Updated info here (just added jitter/throughput to to the datum element)

http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/trunk/nmwg/schema/rnc/iperf.rnc

Examples remained the same for pSB, they are here:

http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/perfSONAR-PS/trunk/doc/service/pSB/

-jason