perfsonar-dev - Drawing Conclusion Meeting - Summary of Developers Session 3
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: Drawing Conclusion Meeting - Summary of Developers Session 3
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:43:02 +0100 (CET)
Hi all,
find attached the summary notes of the developers session 3 of the
drawing conclusion meetings
Best Regards
David Schmitz
Developers Session 3. Interaction within the project
###############################################
1. AL and WIL roles
Al = activity leader
WIL = work item leader
- WIL have no clear definition of responsibilities/tasks/work (of the roles)
(there's the problem to identify who is responsible for what)
###############################################
2. Meetings & Conf Calls
+: very good that we have them (help a lot to make the progress in the
project)
+: IM application (mainly text messaging) is very useful for
communication during tests and other works (consider to use other
applications than Skype)
- needed things: agenda, early available minutes
concise minutes or particularly summary extracted out of the minutes;
most important things discussed:
action backlog + decision log (quick overview)
- reestablish frequent calls with Internet II
###############################################
3. collaborative and comm tools
-: use ticket systems for event instead of bugzilla (only sw devel)
investigate alternatives for bugzilla: e.g. trac
separated for different user groups (e.g. devel, depolyment, operation,
user)
maybe use different tools to do this
bugzilla managed by a person in charge of it who is familiar with it
and regularly keypt uptodate
-: knowledgebase: useful tool, but who is responsible for it, find
alternatives (e.g. trac)
-: wiki: one person in charge of (re)organizing it
-: missing a tool for tracking the progress of work
-: in general: where to locate these tools/resources (currently spreaded over
different domains)?
-: if a person in charge of a tool/area (e.g. bugzilla, test servers) leaves
the project
find very immediatelly a successor (not waiting months)
-: idea:
consider using the same tools (kb) with I2 (one place), but who to keep
one person in charge of it ?
###############################################
4. objective identification and user identification
related to first session (internal processes) yesterday
-: involve regularly the end user
###############################################
- Drawing Conclusion Meeting - Summary of Developers Session 3, David . Schmitz, 01/09/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.