perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Hans Trompert <>
- To: Roland Karch <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:22:47 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Hi Roland,
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Roland Karch wrote:
> Hans Trompert schrieb:
> > I was trying to install the ps-mdm-flowsa-ma from downloads.perfsonar.eu
> > with yum on a cleanly installed Fedora 9 system with the perfSONAR
> > repository enabled, and noticed the following unresolved dependency:
> >
> > java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.06-1jpp.i586 from perfsonar-i386 has
> > depsolving problems
> > --> Missing Dependency: jdk = 2000:1.6.0_06-fcs is needed by package
> > java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.06-1jpp.i586 (perfsonar-i386)
> >
> > But when I disable the perfSONAR repository and do a yum localinstall of
> > the ps-mdm-flowsa-ma and nfdump rpm's after downloading them first, yum
> > decides to use java-1.5.0-gcj that comes with Fedora 9, and everything
> > works just fine.
> >
> > I know that Fedora is one of the unsupported platforms, and on a RHEL 5.2
> > system everything just seem to work as expected, when I try to install
> > ps-mdm-flowsa-ma with the perfSONAR repository enabled yum decides to use
> > the java-1.4.2-gcj-compat that comes with RHEL 5.2.
> >
> > I am not an dependencies specialist, but is there an easy way to fix the
> > dependencies so a repository install will work again on Fedora?
>
> Yum priorities might be the best solution for your problem. Assign a
> lower priority to the perfSONAR repository than the base Fedora
> repository. That way, packages in the perfSONAR repo should no longer
> override packages in the Fedora repo. I'm assuming this is your problem.
I was not aware of the existence of yum priorities. Reading the manual
page on yum.conf I found a way to specify the cost (is this what you
mean?). But both setting the cost higher (1500) and lower (500) than the
default (1000) have no effect whatsoever.
Cheers,
HansT.
- (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Mario Reale, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Mario Reale, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Mario Reale, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/14/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Mario Reale, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Mario Reale, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Roland Karch, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Roland Karch, 11/13/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Hans Trompert, 11/12/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] (changed?) dependencies brake installation on Fedora 9, Mario Reale, 11/12/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.