perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

In Zagreb, Loukik reached an agreement for naming the services
ps-mdm-.... Then as you know he left with the reasoning.
It came back few months later, but at this time, there was no valid
points in favor of it or not. Thus the current situation.

But having seen how the installer work,
- search for packages
- consistency, you have the same naming convention, so you don't have to
remember if it is a geant2 or ps-mdm or a development from a NREN.

It make sense to have a single prefix and it will be ps-mdm, but for the
next release, not for this one (time constrains).

Gijs Molenaar wrote:
> Gijs Molenaar wrote:
>> Nicolas Simar wrote:
>>> Yes it is.
>> So why don't all the packages follow this convention yet? Or am I wrong?
> 
> So? everybody is just going to ignore this question until there is a
> major inconsistency at the release? interesting.

What specific thread is there?

Cheers,
-- 
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________